Product sales fundraisers feel safe, but they typically net only 40-50% of gross sales after cost of goods and vendor fees. Donation-based campaigns net 90% or more. This post breaks down the real math behind both models, when product sales still make sense, and how centralized reporting solves the tracking problem that pushes programs back to vendors in the first place.
Every athletic director eventually asks the same question: should this season's fundraiser sell something, or should it just ask for support directly? The instinct is usually to default to whatever worked last year. That is the wrong way to decide.
The right way is to run the numbers. Product sales and donation-based fundraising are not interchangeable strategies with different flavors. They have fundamentally different cost structures, and one of them almost always nets significantly more per dollar raised. Here is how to think about it before you commit a season's fundraising plan to either model.
Wrapping paper, candy bars, discount cards, spirit wear. These fundraisers feel familiar and low-risk because someone else runs the logistics. That convenience has a price, and it comes directly out of the total raised.
A typical product sales fundraiser nets somewhere between 40 and 50 percent of gross sales. The rest goes to cost of goods, shipping, and the vendor's margin. If your program sells $20,000 in product, you are realistically netting $8,000 to $10,000, not $20,000.
There are also costs that never show up on the settlement check:
None of this makes product sales a bad option in every case. It makes them an expensive one, and expensive is fine only when you know that going in.
Donation-based fundraising flips the cost structure. There is no product, no inventory, and no vendor margin sitting between the donor's dollar and the program's budget. The only real cost is payment processing, which typically runs a few percentage points through a processor like Stripe.
That means a program raising $20,000 through direct donations nets closer to $19,000, not $9,000. Same fundraising effort, roughly double the outcome.
Donation-based campaigns also scale differently. A family member who lives out of state cannot easily buy your discount card, but they can absolutely give $25 to a link shared by text or email. Peer-to-peer sharing extends the donor pool well past the people your athletes see in person, which is where most of the growth potential in modern fundraising actually lives.
There are cases where a product component still earns its place. Spirit wear and concessions serve a real purpose beyond fundraising, since families want the product regardless of the margin. Younger programs sometimes use product sales as a structured way to get kids involved in the ask, which has value that does not show up on a spreadsheet.
The mistake is defaulting to product sales as the primary revenue driver for a season's fundraising goal, when the margin math works against you from the start. Product can be a supplement to a campaign. It is rarely the most efficient way to fund it.
The reason many programs still default to product sales is not that the economics are better. It is that donation-based fundraising, run informally through spreadsheets, personal Venmo accounts, or scattered links, feels harder to track and harder to trust.
That is a platform problem, not a model problem.
Without centralized control, an athletic director has no consolidated view of what each team has raised, no consistent reporting for the district, and no easy way to reconcile who collected what. That lack of visibility pushes programs back toward vendor-run product sales, because at least the vendor sends a check and a summary at the end.
HypeRaise removes that tradeoff. Every campaign runs through one system, with real-time reporting across every team and every organizer, so administrators get the transparency of a vendor relationship without giving up the margin. Payments process through Stripe, which means funds are secure and auditable rather than routed through personal accounts. Families get a simple, direct way to give, without inflated product pricing or delivery delays. And because the platform is built to scale, the same reporting and control that works for one team's campaign works just as well across an entire athletic department running a dozen campaigns at once.
In most cases, yes. Product sales fundraisers typically net 40 to 50 percent of gross sales after cost of goods and vendor fees. Donation-based fundraising through a platform with standard payment processing typically nets 90 percent or more of gross donations.
It is generally simpler. There is no inventory to manage, no order forms to collect, and no product to distribute. The main setup work is launching the campaign and sharing it with the donor network, which a centralized platform handles directly.
Not necessarily. Spirit wear, concessions, and similar items still serve families who want the product itself. The key is not relying on product sales as the primary strategy for hitting a fundraising goal, given the margin difference.
This is where a centralized platform matters. Instead of reconciling individual coach or booster club accounts, a system like HypeRaise gives administrators one dashboard with real-time totals, reporting, and Stripe-backed payment security across every team's campaign.
HypeRaise gives coaches, boosters and parent volunteers the tools to run a centralized, transparent, and effective campaign.
Get Started